Pacific Law Center - GIC878352 - April 20, 2007

Posted by USHOSTAGE at 1/19/2008 11:00 AM
Categories: County of San Diego,Judge Richard E. L. Strauss,Superior Court of California

At minimum on page 5, line 20 where it says "February 27 granting that court order" is wrong. What I said was "on March 9 of 2007".











At minimum the deputy court clerk has removed the document that I had read and signed in court and this court minute order is to give the impression that this is the order that I had agreed to.

The word Anti-Cybersquating is not mentioned in court one time but it is on the court minute order several times.

All court minutes in any court is written after the court hearings, so where is the paper work that I was reading in court and signed?

(On the transcript, statements indicating that I signed a document has been removed - and the judge NEVER used the words Tentative or Anti-Cybersquating in court.)

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this entry.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.